Home
>
Blog
>
Becoming free - part 2

Becoming free - part 2

by

Mieke Mosmuller

10-08-2016 7 comments Print!

Thinking is a purely human faculty. Our consciousness is filled with thoughts, they go on and on, they make us happy, they bring stress, they make us sad. In the night they still persist, although our awareness of them vanishes. Only in dreams can we perceive that they are still there, showing themselves in more or less fantastic images. At the moment of waking up, the dreaming of thoughts continues, but they become attached to our sense-perceptions - they are held together by the senses.


There are moments when we wake up from this dreaming of our thoughts. Then, we bring more willpower in the course of our thoughts; we determine more what we are thinking. Such moments occur when we want to make decisions, when we have to do work that needs thinking, when we start studying, trying to understand what we have to learn.

There is a faculty in us to wake up from our willful thinking, an awakening that exceeds the normal waking thinking. It is an unbinding from our normal thinking that proceeds along the well-trodden paths of education, family, nation, science etc. Rudolf Steiner said once that this is what people fear most of all, this 'free-ness' in thinking. It is not only feared that a race of self-thinking people will arise, it is also that becoming a self-thinking individual is feared by everyone. It is much easier, and seems to be much safer, simply to follow the stream and never stand up in this stream.

The old Greek philosophy of Heraklitos is based on this concept of stream:
'Ever-newer waters flow on those who step into the same rivers.'

In his dialogue 'Cratylus' Plato quotes this idea:
'Everything changes and nothing remains still ... and ... you cannot step twice into the same stream.'

But in our modern times we can change this image: The stream goes on, but the thinker can stand up and form thoughts that he himself wants to form, without being entrained by the stream. From this point on we can even think against the stream, Of course, we will not want to think irrationally or illogically, or with concepts that don't exist. We will want to think in a moral and rational way, but we will want to form these thoughts in an independent way. Fear of this prevents us from starting with this free thinking.

Last week I proposed exercising this free thinking in a harmless way: to 'sing' a simple song inwardly in a reverse way.

There are other exercises for standing up in the stream, for waking up from normal wakefulness in a way of thinking that is not determined, that looses itself from the personal way, the routine, of thinking.

Remember an important decision that you made, many years ago. You know how your life has developed after that decision. Now try to focus on this decision and transform it with another decision that you could have made, but did not. Now you try to live your life in the imagination, how it could have formed itself from this other decision. It is a kind of fantasy: life has not been this way, but it could have been so. While thinking the life you could have had, you free yourself for a moment from the groove you are in, you take another direction.

A second biographic possibility to find a certain free-ness, is to go back to the time you were twelve years old and try to identify with a memory of that time. Try to remember as vividly as possible, so that you see the surroundings, sense the atmosphere, smell or taste what there was to smell and to taste, feel the emotions and so on. If you can detect at the same time how your consciousness is, while remembering, you will feel a liberation from all those phrases, conventions, and routines that glue themselves onto your everyday self.

Becoming free - part 2
Heraclitos in Raphael's School of Athens.Becoming free - part 2 by Mieke Mosmuller

Give your comment please





Comments
  • From @
    Thank you Mieke for your inspiring thoughts. They ring a bell of truth as do your books that I have read: Seek the Light..., Wisdom is..., and The Living Rudolf... The first was a great revelation for me; how you succeeded in forming the book so that it lead my mind to similar revelations to what you then described some pages later. I was amazed! The second had such a wonderful and loving descriptions of its characters and their lives, but I was bothered by the leader/guru theme that filled the second half of the book. Do we really need leaders anymore? And the third chic I just finished today brought the leader-theme even more to the fore. Do we really need to follow Rudolf Steiner or are these Steiner's words truly true?: 'People absolutely ‘unlearned’ thinking. They only think with the thoughts of people they recognise as authorities. People will have to learn to think themselves; every human being must start to think by himself. Otherwise they will be influenced by the spiritual world, precisely because they don't believe in it, and they will be influenced in a bad way. ' I understand that Steiner is pointing to the freedom inherent, but mostly unused, in all of us. To become free is to be free from the true pointer, or Rudolf Steiner, as well. The last pages of this book about Steiner contained amazingly fluid and accurate reflections, the Light shines through them. The Light can shine through whatever we do as it also shines through these new reflections of Mieke.
    • From Mieke Mosmuller @
      Dear Klaus, in my novels I started to form imaginations of the processes I described in Seek the light - and the processes became persons. The pure thinking is impersonated in Johannes. So he is not meant as a guru, but as an image of the greatness (or whatever name you would want to give to it) of pure thinking in every living human being that develops it. In my later novels this 'person' always appears when the main character comes near to pure thinking. Of course these imaginations are not perfect, but Johannes is not meant as a guru at all. Concerning Rudolf Steiner, I think that the most important issue is that we discern between process and content. What Steiner says about free thinking has nothing to do with content, it is a process of becoming free in thinking. We can also be fully free in thinking when we think and acknowledge what Steiner has thought. We should not follow his thoughts blindly, but the mark of free-ness in thinking is that we are able to think all possible thoughts, because we ourselves acknowledge the truth in these thoughts. Then we can freely think along with Steiner and still form these thoughts as if they are our own thoughts.
      Well, it is difficult to express in a few lines, but I tried...
      • From @
        Dear Mieke, thank you for trying:) I see the point you make about Johannes. Maybe I should read the book anew with this in mind? But as you know we still live in a world "waiting for a savior", for somebody to lead us away from our inner demons. Our inherent program is to ignore our own darkness and seek the light from somebody else out there. That is why even those. like Steiner, who never wanted to become a guru have been given that role. How can a leader lead us to our inner savior if we are afraid of the demons guarding the light within? Is it worth our, you and me, while to fight the demons of others, whether Steiner's followers or others? Or should we concentrate on living and creating form the purity of free thinking? For I am not free of the past as long as I fight it. My fighting it actually keeps it alive, like a dragon endlessly bringing up new heads after the dragon slayer has cut down one. So what is the true action arising from free thinking? For you, Mieke, and for me. PS. If you want to read more of what I have written see www.klausra.com.
  • From Marita Stomp @
    Beste Mieke ,

    dank je voor deze oefeningen ! gelukkig kan ik me hele goed situaties herinneren dus zal de oefening hopelijk goed gaan!
    Ja inderdaad het zelfstandig kunnen denken dat is lijkt me een beetje eng , waar zou je terecht kunnen komen?! ik ben bang voor de eenzaamheid en voor de verantwoordelijkheid maar verantwoordelijkheid over wat? dt weet ik niet eens ! is het gevaarlijk bijvoorbeeld dat soort angsten ...mijn hoofd gaat heel hard rennen ! Toch ga ik het proberen ! Ik hoop dat ik mijn '' heel hard rennen '' gedachten kan elimineren of in ieder geval vertragen en alle overbodige gedachten , en de gedachten die ik heb, alleen maar omdat ik tv heb gekeken of een tijdschrift heb gelezen dat ik vergeten ben wat nu van mij is of opgedrongen door het dagelijks leven en de fictie die ik ben geworden (niet dat ik niet ''mezelf '' ben maar toch een soort constructie)blijkbaar ,toch? . Ik ben heel bang maar ook heel benieuwd ,zou ik leuk en intelligent zijn? zou ik nog iets kunnen ''worden'' creeren? zou ik al helemaal goed zijn zoals ik ben? zou ik geniaal blijken te zijn hierna ? of gewoon ZIJN ? Dit denk ik allemaal omdat ik me soms afvraag hoe komt het toch dat ik zo sukkelig overkom en niet goed uit mijn woorden ,terwijl als ik de motief lees ...of euritmie doe het wel ''begrijp'' kan ik mijn trauma,s afleggen zou dat nog kunnen ? ok ik heb het begrepen ! de oefeningen zijn er om los te komen van het aardegebonden ego denken ! en de meeste mensen zijn bang voor het werkelijk zelfstandig kunnen denken ! Ik merk dat ik hert net heb zitten in te vullen en dat is dan weer zo een voorbeeld van ANGST en redenen zoeken om het niet te doen. Ik laat je dus even zien hoe mijn gedachten gaan. Ik zou ervoor willen gaan zonder de verwachting van een beloning en de consequenties ervan accepteren ! het is als een sprong in het diepe in het ongewisse ! ja dat! lieve groet ,Marita Stomp

  • From Lola Kirigin @
    Hi Mieke - thanks for the suggestions to develop free-ness in thinking.
    I sense it will take continuous effort to cultivate this, which is like learning a new habit - eg to drive a car - but doing it consciously each time.
    'Ever-newer waters flow on those who step into the same rivers.'
    ‘Everything changes and nothing remains still ... and ... you cannot step twice into the same stream.'
    surely refers to developing this healthier habit in the freshness that thinking exercises bring , contrary to what goes on in the mind on auto-pilot, so that we can perceive and feel the living reality of situations instead of the same old, same old perceptions from ingrained prejudices.
    I do like the idea of ‘standing up and not being, entrained or carried away by the stream’ as long as I can recognize the nature of that stream and can be certain I bring something more beneficial in resisting this.


    • From Mieke Mosmuller @
      Dear Lola, it is always the difficulty of the difference between content and process. The standing up and resisting the stream is a kind of inner gymnastic exercise, with no other use than that. Regarding the contents the new, free thought can be rather simple and not at all as beautiful or wise as the thoughts in the stream are - but still stimulate a free thinking that can assume beauty, wisdom and strength later.
  • From Marie Anne Paepe @
    Bij de biografische oefening is het voor mij belangrijk van bewust te beginnen en te eindigen, m.a.w. het poortje te openen en dat poortje na afloop ook weer te sluiten - net zoals bij een meditatieoefening trouwens.
    Als ik de tijd zou hebben, zou ik de verhalen opschrijven. Er zijn schrijvers die op deze manier een roman schrijven, zoals bijvoorbeeld Christine Angot. Autofiction heet dit literaire genre. Dat moet heerlijk zijn om te doen, maar gewoon de oefening vind ik al ook al boeiend.
    Dank je wel hoor !